Companies ask US judiciary group to force lawsuit funding disclosures
Adds comment in paragraphs 11, 12 from funding advocate
By Mike Scarcella
Oct 3 (Reuters) -More than 100 major companies from the technology, pharmaceutical, automotive and other sectors have urged the U.S. judiciary to adopt a nationwide rule requiring disclosure of third-party litigation funding in lawsuits.
Companies including Amazon.com, Google, Cisco, Meta, Comcast, Exxon, Zurich, Eli Lilly, Bayer, Ford, Pfizer and Novartis submitted the letter on Wednesday to the federal courts’ Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, in advance of a hearing by the committee next week.
Litigation funding, where a financier backs clients' cases in exchange for a cut of an eventual settlement or judgment, has become a multibillion-dollar industry in recent years.
Some U.S. courts require disclosure of outside funding, but there is no uniformity across the judiciary.
The companies either had no immediate comment or did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the letter, which was organized by defense-focused Lawyers for Civil Justice.
Some of the signatories have previously expressed concern about litigation funding and the need for greater oversight. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups have for years called on standardizing funding disclosure rules.
The Chamber's Institute for Legal Reform submitted a letter on Wednesday to the advisory committee urging greater oversight, and Republican U.S. Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis expressed a similar view.
The companies’ letter said disclosures about financial backers in cases are necessary to allow defendants to make informed decisions about the course of litigation. They said outside funding “fundamentally alters the dynamics and has a major impact on whether the dispute can be resolved through settlement.”
Christopher Bogart, chief executive of litigation funder Burford Capital, in a statement on Thursday questioned the motives of the companies that signed onto the letter and rejected their call for mandatory disclosures.
"What they want is to keep their unfair advantage in the justice system and to drive up costs for anyone who sues them – which is exactly what they do whenever they find out about the identity of a litigation funder,” Bogart said.
The International Legal Finance Association, a Washington, D.C. group that advocates for the funding industry, in a statement on Thursday criticized the drive for a nationwide disclosure rule.
"These companies yet again are attempting to further tilt the justice system in their own favor by forcing their challengers to disclose privileged information about their legal strategies," Shannon Campagna, the group's acting executive director, said.
The judiciary's civil rules advisory committee is meeting on Oct. 10 in Washington, D.C. The panel said its agenda includes a discussion of amending court rules to require disclosure of litigation funding. No formal proposal is up for a vote.
A representative for the committee declined to comment.
The committee last discussed litigation funding in late 2021.
Read more:
Louisiana law places new rules on litigation funders
Litigation funder Burford fights order denying bid to take over Sysco cases
US litigation funding in 'state of flux' as deal commitments dip, says report
Litigation funders deployed $3.2 bln in U.S. investments last year - report
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
