China tech war will hold Asian allies hostage
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.
By Robyn Mak
HONG KONG, Dec 16 (Reuters Breakingviews) -China will turn Washington’s technology weapons on its Asian neighbours in 2025. U.S. curbs on imports of semiconductors and other goods have hobbled advances in artificial intelligence in the world’s second-largest economy. The People’s Republic is starting to retaliate. Its leverage over corporate giants in Japan and South Korea makes them prime hostage targets.
In 2022, outgoing U.S. President Joe Biden introduced sweeping measures to block China’s access to cutting-edge chips and chipmaking technology. Since then, Washington has expanded the controls to cover a broader array of equipment and materials, including machines and tools made by Dutch giant ASML ASML.AS and Japan’s Tokyo Electron 8035.T. In December, the Biden administration added more than 100 Chinese entities to its trade restriction list as part of its new package of controls.
The tightening restrictions have prompted Beijing to respond. In mid-2023, the government started requiring export licences for gallium, germanium, graphite and antimony – materials vital for making batteries, semiconductors, fibre optics and weapons. But a closer look at the trade flows did not show Chinese authorities systematically denied export licences, according to Cory Combs, a researcher from analysis firm Trivium China. That is about to change. In response to Washington’s latest controls, the Chinese government announced an outright ban on some of these materials being exported to the United States – its strongest tit-for-tat measure yet.
Further retaliation is likely as China falls further behind in AI. Local technology giants like Tencent 0700.HK and Baidu 9888.HK are running down their stockpiles of now-banned Nvidia NVDA.O chips and will have no choice but to turn to domestic alternatives to train their AI models. But the latest chip designed by local semiconductor darling Huawei, the country’s best answer to Nvidia’s coveted graphics processing units, is three generations behind the $3.3 trillion U.S. market leader, Bloomberg reported.
Against this backdrop, Beijing has been quietly laying the groundwork to weaponise its near monopoly on rare earths and critical minerals. In June, the government unveiled a raft of regulations aimed at protecting the country’s rare earth supplies; these rules cover mining, smelting and trading and establish state ownership of rare earths resources.
The latest export ban from China’s Ministry of Commerce follows an overhaul of existing rules. Whereas past curbs on gallium and germanium have been piecemeal, the new unified regime grants stricter government oversight on technologies and goods that can be used for civilian and military purposes. Businesses selling certain types of graphite, used in electric-vehicle batteries, must first disclose details about their overseas customers and the end use of the materials. Taking a page out of Washington’s sanctions playbook, China will also have a “control list” of foreign companies which are subject to extra restrictions and licences.
Yet targeting American firms like Micron Technology MU.O or Tesla TSLA.O at a time when the struggling Chinese economy needs trading partners, foreign investment and tech know-how could be self-defeating. In 2023, Chinese infrastructure companies were banned from buying certain memory chips from Micron. Even so, a year later, the Idaho-based firm’s ties to China have strengthened, with Chief Executive Sanjay Mehrotra meeting with the Minister of Commerce and breaking ground on a new factory in the country in 2024. Meanwhile, carmaker Tesla’s China sales are on track to grow by 14% to $23 billion in 2025, per Visible Alpha forecasts.
Instead, Beijing holds far more leverage over U.S. allies in Asia. A Japanese government white paper found that the country relies on China for nearly a third of its imports, compared to 13% for the United States. These goods range from machinery to organic chemicals to electrical equipment. And despite official efforts to diversify supply chains away from China, a separate study found South Korea’s dependence on the People’s Republic for five out of six raw materials necessary for chipmaking actually increased in 2023.
That puts Tokyo and Seoul’s corporate champions in a vulnerable position. Toyota has privately voiced concerns that China would cut off the $220 billion carmaker’s access to critical minerals, Bloomberg reported in September, citing sources. In addition to supply chains, it also has factories on the mainland. South Korea’s memory chip giants SK Hynix 000660.KS and Samsung Electronics 005930.KS, as well as battery specialists LG Chem 051910.KS and SK On, are in a similar boat.
Just a threat of export controls might be sufficient for those countries to think twice about joining the tech war against China. Beijing has plenty of weapons to fight back. In 2025 it will train them on U.S. allies.
Follow @mak_robyn on X
This is a Reuters Breakingviews prediction for 2025. To read more of our predictions, click here.
Graphic: Japan’s trade deficit with China is growing https://reut.rs/3D1rQbl
Graphic: South Korea’s China trade surplus has become a deficit https://reut.rs/3ZEP0Ny
Editing by Peter Thal Larsen and Oliver Taslic
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
