China funds cut ETF fees, escalating price war in booming market
SHANGHAI/HONG KONG, Nov 20 (Reuters) -Major Chinese fund companies announced a reduction in fees for a batch of equity exchange-traded funds (ETFs) on Wednesday, intensifying price competition in the rapidly expanding $400 billion sector of the market.
The move to cut management and custodian fees came a day after Wu Qing, China's chief securities regulator, pledged to encourage index investment and fund industry fee reform.
ETFs - funds that typically track an index and trade on an exchange - have boomed this year as fund companies compete fiercely to lure investors disillusioned by poorly performing active fund managers. The latest fee cuts are expected to potentially channel new capital into a waning bull market.
China Asset Management Co (ChinaAMC), the country's top ETF manager, said in a statement it would cut fees in eight ETF products, including the 160 billion yuan ($22.10 billion) China SSE 50 ETF 510050.SS, to "lower investors' wealth management cost".
The management fee would be slashed to 0.15% from 0.5%, while the custodian fee would be reduced to 0.05% from 0.1%.
Fund companies including E Fund Management, Huatai-PineBridge Fund Management, Harvest Fund Management and HuaAn Fund Management made similar statements.
Net inflows into China's onshore ETFs have exceeded 900 billion yuan so far this year, on track to register the biggest inflows over the past decade, according to BNP Paribas.
China's stock ETFs, which hit 1.81 trillion yuan at the end of June, have already exceeded 3 trillion yuan. That is a 66% jump in less than five months.
The boom was partly aided by state funds piling into a struggling market early in the year via ETFs. Cut-throat competition for market share also helped drive down fees and attract inflows.
Investors are also turning to ETFs - a relatively cheap and convenient investment vehicle - away from active funds whose performance has disappointed.
Most active funds were caught off guard by China's sudden, policy-led bull run that started in late September, and their conservative positions meant they could not beat the surging indexes.
An index trading China's active equity funds .CSI930890 has gained just 3% this year, far lagging the benchmark index CSI300 .CSI300, which has jumped 16%.
"Active fund managers cannot even beat the market, and they have lost trust with investors," said Lu Deyong, an individual stock trader in northeastern China. "Retail investors now prefer to place their bets via ETFs.
China's passive funds last month exceeded active funds in their China stock holdings, according to the official Shanghai Securities News.
($1 = 7.2409 Chinese yuan)
Reporting by Samuel Shen and Summer Zhen; Editing by Jacqueline Wong
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
