China criticises Trump tariff threat, says it won't solve America's problems
Corrects lower end of tariff range in paragraph 6 to 7.5%, not 7%
China says US tariffs will not solve America's problems
Says US, China should work to promote stable, sustainable ties
Apple, Tesla and Starbucks praised in Chinese state media
Commentary reminiscent of trade war during Trump's first term
By Joe Cash
BEIJING, Nov 28 (Reuters) -China attacked U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's pledge to slap additional tariffs on Chinese goods over fentanyl flows, saying his incoming administration was pushing the blame for America's opioid crisis onto China.
Trump, who takes office on Jan. 20, said on Monday he would impose a 10% tariff on Chinese goods so that Beijing does more to stop the trafficking of Chinese-made chemicals used in the highly addictive narcotic.
He also threatened tariffs in excess of 60% on Chinese goods while on the campaign trail.
"China's position against unilateral tariff increases is consistent," He Yadong, a spokesperson for China's commerce ministry, told a regular news briefing on Thursday. "Imposing arbitrary tariffs on trading partners will not solve America's own problems."
He added that the U.S. should abide by World Trade Organization rules and work with China to promote stable economic and trade relations.
Trump's comments fired the starting gun for what analysts expect to be a bruising four-year trade war, potentially much worse than his first term which saw tariffs of 7.5%-25% levied and global supply chains uprooted.
Indeed, Howard Lutnick, Trump's pick to run the Commerce Department and oversee the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, said in a podcast interview in October that "China is attacking America" with fentanyl and suggested Trump might levy tariffs as high as 200% on China.
Editorials in China's state media this week have warned new duties could drag the world's top two economies into a mutually destructive tariff war.
DEJA VU
There was already an eerie sense of deja vu on Thursday after China's state media praised some U.S. firms for "strong collaboration" - commentary reminiscent of how tensions with the U.S. were covered by the Chinese press during the previous trade war.
Back then, U.S. corporate executives and foreign investors would scour Chinese state media for signals as to which U.S. firms might be in favour and which might be penalised as tensions ratcheted up.
The state-owned Global Times late on Wednesday highlighted Apple AAPL.O, Tesla TSLA.O, Starbucks SBUX.O and HP HPE.N.
"U.S. politicians need to pay attention to and respect the evident willingness of American businesses for economic and trade cooperation by tailoring suitable policy environments for enterprises," it said.
The China Daily also noted that Morgan Stanley MS.N received regulatory approval in March to expand its China operations, citing this as evidence of foreign financial firms' enthusiasm for investing in China.
"Neither side was good about communicating policy directly, so business was busy looking at the tea leaves and trying to separate signal and noise in traditional and social media," a Beijing-based American executive said of the first trade war.
The executive was not authorised to speak to media and declined to be identified.
The U.S.-China trade war during Trump's first term saw China threaten to ban U.S. companies from importing, exporting and investing in China with the creation of the "Unreliable Entity List".
At the time, Global Times reported the list would target U.S. companies such as Apple, Cisco Systems CSCO.O and Qualcomm QCOM.O. But China never followed through on the threat and to date the list has only included U.S. companies involved in the sale of arms to Taiwan.
Bo Zhengyuan, a Shanghai-based partner at consultancy Plenum, said he expected Beijing would not rush to use tools like the Unreliable Entity List in the immediate wake of any formal tariff announcement once Trump is in power, given the weak state of the Chinese economy.
But Beijing could retaliate later if it felt U.S. policymakers were harming China's commercial interests.
"There was collateral damage last time, and there will be collateral damage this time," he added.
Reporting by Joe Cash; Editing by Edwina Gibbs
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
