Breakup alarm rings at $50 bln building superstore
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Jeffrey Goldfarb
NEW YORK, May 29 (Reuters Breakingviews) -The cold wind blowing through Johnson Controls International JCI.N is not from its heavy-duty air conditioners, but instead from pushy investors who could call time on boss George Oliver’s tenure leading the $50 billion industrial conglomerate. The biggest issue: a merger he helped orchestrate eight years ago has turned out to be mostly hot air.
Oliver became chief executive soon after Johnson Controls acquired Tyco, the company he was running, for about $17 billion. Tax avoidance played a role, relocating the U.S. buyer’s headquarters to lower-rate Ireland. The duo also promised revenue uplifts from cross-selling heating and cooling with fire sprinklers and video surveillance.
The results have been underwhelming. Since 2019, the year after Johnson Controls sold its car-battery division for $13 billion, the remodeled company’s compound annual top-line growth has been less than 3%, compared to a five-year average of about 7% for companies tracked by the S&P 500 Index .SPX, according to FactSet. Its total shareholder return, including reinvested dividends, of about 100% since Oliver became CEO broadly tracks with fellow building-security providers. But rivals in heating, ventilation and air conditioning Lennox International LII.N and Trane Technologies have generated returns of 200% and 400%, respectively, over the same span.
These disparities help explain the arrival of aggressive fund managers Elliott Management and Soroban Capital. They have not said what they want. Given the company’s performance, however, it would hardly be surprising to see a push to replace Oliver, or even for a breakup that effectively unpicks the Tyco transaction.
For now, Oliver is sticking to his one-stop shop idea. He wants Johnson Controls to secure higher-margin service deals for as much as 90% of its commercial contracts, up from nearly half now, while offloading a quarter of the company’s existing portfolio, probably residential HVAC. The premise is to persuade investors to regard the company more like elevator operator Otis Worldwide OTIS.N, which trades near 17 times anticipated EBITDA over the next year, using estimates compiled by LSEG.
Looked at another way, climate-control peers command valuation multiples of about 18 times. Despite Johnson Controls deriving half its earnings from commercial heating and cooling, according to Wolfe Research analysts, it trades closer to the 13 times at which fire and security specialists trade. The valuation gap is even more vexing given the construction frenzy in data centers, which have substantial cooling needs. Updated energy-efficiency rules also will prompt additional spending on new and existing buildings.
Instead of fully capitalizing on these upswings, Oliver has been trying to justify the lackluster Tyco deal. For all the warning sensors Johnson Controls produces, it failed to detect the risks of the strategy.
Follow @jgfarb on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Activist hedge fund Elliott Management has accumulated a stake worth more than $1 billion in Johnson Controls International, which installs cooling and security systems in buildings, according to a Bloomberg report on May 19, citing unnamed sources. Fellow pushy investor Soroban Capital also has amassed a position in the company worth more than $500 million, Bloomberg reported a day later.
Johnson Controls fails to heat up investor returns Johnson Controls fails to heat up investor returns https://reut.rs/3X3MvDA
Editing by Jonathan Guilford and Pranav Kiran
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
