XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

Boeing, Virgin Galactic settle lawsuit over work on Virgin 'mothership'



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Boeing, Virgin Galactic settle lawsuit over work on Virgin 'mothership'</title></head><body>

By Blake Brittain and Mike Scarcella

Oct 3 -Boeing BA.N and Virgin Galactic SPCE.N have settled a lawsuit stemming from Boeing's work on Virgin Galactic's space tourism "mothership," according to a Thursday filing in Virginia federal court.

A docket entry in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia said the case had been resolved after a settlement conference held earlier that day.

Virgin Galactic attorney Brett Williamson and Boeing said in emails that the lawsuit was "satisfactorily resolved by mutual agreement of the parties."

The companies did not provide more information about the settlement.

Virgin Galactic's mothership jet carrier delivers sightseeing vessels into suborbital space. The company completed its first commercial flight last year.

Virgin signed a contract with Boeing's Aurora Flight Sciences in 2022 to help design a new mothership. Boeing later said that the mothership would cost more and take longer to develop than expected.

Boeing sued Virgin in March, accusing it of stealing trade secrets and refusing to pay $25 million owed for Boeing's work. The lawsuit said Virgin took proprietary information from Boeing including test data and math equations.

Virgin countersued in California in April, claiming Boeing performed "shoddy and incomplete work" on the aircraft. Virgin said it was entitled to monetary damages of at least "the difference between the $45.6 million paid by Virgin Galactic to Boeing and the substantially lower actual value of Boeing's performance."

Virgin dismissed the California lawsuit in June and said it would pursue its claims in the Virginia case.

A jury trial was set to start in December in the Virginia case.

The case is The Boeing Company and Aurora Flight Sciences Corp v. Virgin Galactic LLC, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, No. 1:24-cv-00456.

For Boeing: Stephen Cowen, Brian Rabbitt and Megan Lacy Owen of Jones Day

For Virgin Galactic: Brett Williamson of O'Melveny & Myers

Read more:

Boeing lawsuit accuses Virgin Galactic of stealing trade secrets

Virgin Galactic countersues Boeing for 'shoddy' work on new ‘mothership’

Virgin Galactic, Boeing legal battle over spacecraft moves to Virginia



Reporting by Blake Brittain and Mike Scarcella in Washington

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.