XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

BioNTech sued by UPenn over 19 vaccine patent royalties



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>BioNTech sued by UPenn over COVID-19 vaccine patent royalties</title></head><body>

By Blake Brittain

Aug 6 (Reuters) -The University of Pennsylvania has sued German biotechnology firm BioNTech 22UAy.DE in Pennsylvania federal court, accusing the company of underpaying royalties for patents covering Penn technology used in BioNTech and Pfizer's PFE.N COVID-19 vaccine Comirnaty.

The lawsuit, filed on Monday, said that BioNTech owes the school a greater share of its worldwide vaccine sales for using "foundational" messenger RNA (mRNA) inventions developed by Penn professors and Nobel Prize winners Katalin Kariko and Drew Weissman.

Spokespeople for BioNTech did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the complaint. A spokesperson for Penn said the school is "seeking full royalty payments under patent licensing agreements that enabled BioNTech to develop its marketed COVID vaccine."

Pfizer is not a defendant.

The complaint adds to a web of patent lawsuits filed against BioNTech, Pfizer, Moderna and others over technology used in their blockbuster COVID-19 vaccines.

Penn's lawsuit said that BioNTech received a sublicense to the school's technology through another company in 2017, which it later used to develop Comirnaty with Pfizer.

Pfizer made $11.2 billion from sales of Comirnaty last year, according to a company report.

The lawsuit said that BioNTech has only been paying royalties for shots "sold into" countries where the school owns a patent, but owes royalties for all vaccines "made" in countries where Penn has patents under their contract.

According to the university, BioNTech manufactures all of its Comirnaty shots "in countries where Penn has patents in force, triggering a royalty on all products."

"For that reason, BioNTech must pay royalties as a percentage of its entire worldwide sales and not, as it has done to date, on only a portion," Penn said.

Penn asked the court for monetary damages and an order forcing BioNTech to comply with their contract.


The case is Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania v. BioNTech SE, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 2:24-cv-03801.

For Penn: Jake Holdreith, Christopher Pinahs and Manleen Singh of Robins Kaplan

For BioNTech: attorney information not yet available



Reporting by Blake Brittain in Washington

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.