Big steelmakers failing to make the switch to renewables, survey shows
By David Stanway
SINGAPORE, Nov 29 (Reuters) -The world's biggest steelmakers are falling behind in the shift towards low-carbon production, with some still entirely dependent on fossil fuels for their energy, a survey of 18 leading firms showed on Friday.
Steel is responsible for 7% of global carbon dioxide emissions, around the same as India, with coal-fired blast furnaces producing 2 metric tons of CO2 for each ton of output.
Alternative technologies are available, including electric arc furnaces (EAFs) that can be powered with renewables, and efforts are underway to produce iron using "green hydrogen" rather than coal.
But some of the industry's biggest names still relied on fossil fuels for 99% of their energy over 2022-2023, the Sydney-based climate group Action Speaks Louder (ASL) said.
Steel is considered a "hard to abate" sector, but the main obstacle is affordability, said Laura Kelly, ASL's strategy director and the survey's author.
"This messaging about 'hard to abate' is still implying it is not technologically possible," she said.
The best performer was Sweden's SSAB SSABa.ST, which sourced 19% of its energy from renewables, while some of the biggest laggards were in South Korea.
The share of renewables in the energy use of Hyundai Steel 004020.KS, Dongkuk Steel 460860.KS and Posco 005490.KS stood at zero or close to zero, even though they produce large quantities of steel through EAFs. None of the firms responded to requests for comment.
Kelly said some firms have vested interests in maintaining the status quo because of investments in fossil fuel infrastructure, including import terminals and pipelines.
India's JSW Steel JSTL.NS sourced 0.4% of its energy from renewables. It aims to run all its steel operations using clean energy and waste gas by 2030, said chief sustainability officer Prabodha Acharya.
Baosteel 600019.SS, China's biggest steelmaker, also sourced 0.4% of its energy from renewables in 2022. The company told Reuters it was drawing up new clean energy targets.
Steelmakers will come under growing pressure to shift to cleaner energy as carbon pricing initiatives come into force.
"If it is not hurting them financially now, it is hurting them strategically because they are lagging on that transition plan," Kelly said.
Reporting by David Stanway; Additional reporting by Amy Lv in Beijing; Editing by Kim Coghill
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
