Auto tech company CDK settles dealers’ antitrust lawsuit for $100 mln
By Mike Scarcella
Aug 16 (Reuters) -Automotive technology giant CDK Global has agreed to pay $100 million to settle a nationwide class action by retail auto dealerships claiming they overpaid for the company’s dealer management systems.
Lawyers representing a class of thousands of dealers filed the proposed settlement on Friday in Chicago federal court. The accord requires a judge’s approval.
Austin, Texas-based CDK sells software platforms to dealers to run their daily sales, financing and service operations.
The plaintiffs alleged CDK violated antitrust law by conspiring to eliminate competition among vendors that need to access dealer data to create apps for dealers. Those apps can include inventory management, repair orders, warranty services and other functions within dealer-management systems.
CDK has denied the claims and did not admit wrongdoing in the settlement.
CDK, its lawyers and plaintiffs’ attorneys for the auto dealers did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The proposed settlement covers purchases of dealer management systems from CDK and a rival, Reynolds & Reynolds, since September 2013. Reynolds in 2018 settled claims lodged by car dealers for nearly $30 million. It did not admit wrongdoing.
The plaintiffs' lawyers said they would seek up to 33% of the combined settlement funds from CDK and Reynolds for legal fees, or about $34 million.
A trial in the dealers’ case had been set for September.
CDK faces other legal claims over its business practices.
A judge last month ruled software vendors can band together as a class to sue CDK for allegedly restricting access to data and causing them to pay hundreds of millions of dollars in overcharges.
Chief U.S. District Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer said AutoLoop, which sells software to thousands of dealerships, had met the legal standard to certify its 2018 lawsuit as a class action with hundreds of other auto industry vendors.
The case is In re Dealer Management Systems Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, No. 1:18-cv-00864.
For dealer class: Peggy J. Wedgworth and Elizabeth McKenna of Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman
For CDK: Mark Filip and Craig Primis of Kirkland & Ellis
Read more:
Automotive tech company CDK must face antitrust class action, judge says
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
