XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

Australia should lead the energy transition, but is it missing the boat?: Russell



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>RPT-COLUMN-Australia should lead the energy transition, but is it missing the boat?: Russell</title></head><body>

This is a repeat of an item issued on Wednesday

By Clyde Russell

SYDNEY, Oct 30 (Reuters) -It is no secret that Australia is one of the countries best placed to take advantage of the energy transition, given its abundance of minerals, renewable energy potential, stable government and proximity to the growing markets of Asia.

But Sentiment was somewhat downbeat at this week's massive gathering of the mining and related sectors at the International Mining and Resources Conference (IMARC) in Sydney.

While speaker after speaker outlined available opportunities, there were always the caveats that Australia is risking missing the boat and losing out to competitor nations when it comes to leading the energy transition and the minerals needed to make the switch from fossil fuels to cleaner power.

Australia is the world's largest exporter of lithium and iron ore and is a major producer of copper, nickel, manganese and aluminium.

It is also the world's second-largest shipper of coal and liquefied natural gas, which underscores that it is still largely dependent on fossil fuels for much of its export revenues, which are at risk as the energy transition gathers accelerates.

It is for this reason that the mining industry sees the imperative to embrace a clean energy future, and the ambition is that Australia maintains its leading role as a supplier of the key minerals.

But there is also the increasing risk that Australia is being left behind, with other countries with access to cheaper capital and energy, as well as easier government regulations and processes, starting to pull ahead.

The iron ore sector is one example.

Australia supplies about two-thirds of China's imports of the key raw material, and in turn China uses the iron ore to produce about half the world's steel.

Steel making is carbon intensive and contributes about 8% of global emissions, given its reliance on coal as the main energy source.

Decarbonising steel is thus a key plank of the energy transition and Australia should be the global leader.

The idea is to take iron ore and use hydrogen produced from green energies such as solar and wind to beneficiate it into a product such as hot briquetted iron, which in turn can be made into steel using electric furnaces.

But in order for this to happen, the iron ore sector is going to need cheap electricity, and in vast quantities.

Dino Otranto, the chief executive of Fortescue Group, Australia's third-biggest iron ore miner, told IMARC on Tuesday that nothing would happen without cheap electricity.

With globally competitive energy costs Australia can "fully take our commodities and turn them into products the world wants," Otranto said.

ELECTRICITY DILEMMA

The problem comes in delivering the cheap electricity. While miners talk of building partnerships with companies and increasing collaboration, the issue always comes back to cost.

Why would a solar energy company invest billions of dollars to build plants, only to sell the electricity produced at such a low cost to the mining sector, so it can make profits selling cleaner products to China and other buyers in Asia?

No company would, meaning that it will be difficult to get the price of renewable energy cheap enough in Australia to make it competitive with countries such as those in the Middle East, which already are providing low-cost power to miners such as Brazil's Vale for iron ore beneficiation.

In past decades Australia's state and federal governments took the lead in providing cheap electricity to fuel industrial development, an example being the use of state-built hydropower in Tasmania to power aluminium, manganese and zinc smelters.

But governments are more cash-strapped currently and wary of imposing costs on taxpayers complaining of the cost of living, meaning that the capital to turn Australia into a green superpower will likely have to be largely private.

One role governments could play more effectively is cutting down on the time needed and the complexity of approvals, and while the politicians at IMARC were unanimous in saying they were doing just that, the mining sector is privately considerably more sceptical.

For now, the main challenge for the mining sector is working out how to turn vision into reality, and at a scale that keeps Australia at the forefront of the energy transition.

The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.



Editing by Clarence Fernandez

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.