Australia regulator sues NAB for ignoring hardship application deadlines
Adds shares in paragraph 2, ASIC quote in paragraphs 5,9, context in paragraphs 8-11
Nov 18 (Reuters) -Australia's corporate watchdog on Monday launched civil penalty proceedings against National Australia Bank NAB.AX, the country's second-largest lender, for failing to respond to hundreds of financial hardship applications within the legally mandated time frame.
Shares in NAB slipped as much as 1.9% to A$38.98 in early trade, largely in-line with a 1.2% fall in the broader financial sub-index .AXFJ.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) claims that NAB and its unit AFSH Nominees failed to meet the legal 21-day deadline for responding to 345 hardship applications over a five-year period from 2018 to 2023.
Among those affected by NAB's delayed responses were individuals facing severe personal challenges, such as survivors of domestic abuse, those struggling with grave health issues, and people coping with unemployment or the closure of their businesses, ASIC said.
"NAB's failures likely compounded the already challenging situation for these people," ASIC Chair Joe Longo said.
Under Section 72 of Australia's National Credit Code, an individual with overdue payments can request a change to the terms of their credit contract on the grounds of financial hardship, and creditors are expected to provide a response in writing within 21 days of being informed.
"NAB and AFSH Nominees are now considering the detail of the proceedings brought by ASIC and will continue to cooperate fully with the regulator," the Melbourne-headquartered lender said in a separate statement.
ASIC's comprehensive review of major lenders' financial hardship practices,completed in May 2024, revealed significant failures in identifying and supporting struggling customers.
"We will not hesitate to take decisive action when banks and lenders fail to comply with their obligations," Longo said.
The corporate regulator is seeking declarations, pecuniary penalties and adverse publicity orders against NAB and AFSH, it said.
In a similar action last year, ASIC launched legal proceedings against Westpac Banking Corp WBC.AX, another major Australian lender, for alleged misconduct in handling financial hardship cases.
Reporting by Roushni Nair in Bengaluru; Editing by Lisa Shumaker and Andrea Ricci
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
