ANZ CEO says no evidence bond trading scandal has cost Australian taxpayers
Adds details about sacked traders, reputational damage, CEO pay
By Byron Kaye
SYDNEY, Aug 30 (Reuters) -ANZ ANZ.AX, Australia's third-largest retail bank, has found no evidence that suspected misconduct by its employees during a 2023 government bond issuance had cost Australian taxpayers, its CEO told a parliamentary inquiry on Friday.
The company is being investigated by the Australian corporate regulator after media reports this year said the bank's bond trading department was suspected of overstating its role in the debt raising.
Already the prudential regulator has told the bank to increase the amount of cash it keeps on hand by 50% due to concerns about its risk management.
"There has been speculation that potential misconduct by ANZ in connection with this issuance may have cost taxpayers," CEO Shayne Elliott said in prepared remarks to a parliamentary hearing.
"From what I have seen, there is no evidence of this."
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) did not respond immediately to a request for comment.
Separate to the ASIC probe, ANZ has said it is investigating potential wrongdoing by its staff in the government bond issuance, as well as misreporting of bond trading data and behaviour-related misconduct in its bond trading unit.
Asked about the unit in parliament, Elliott said the A$90 billion ($61 billion) company had suffered "significant reputational damage" but had "not seen, and I've not seen, any evidence that supports any misconduct, market manipulation otherwise, from ANZ".
Asked about media reports that said ANZ might have overstated the volume of bond trades it participated in, Elliott said the bank's initial inquiries found employees had entered some trading data in the wrong category but "it was mistake, we see no evidence that it was deliberate".
As a result of that mistake, the Melbourne-headquartered company had both overreported and underreported trading volumes, he added.
Elliott said the bank had fired one bond trader, reached agreements for another two to leave and given a formal warning to a fourth after complaints about "profanity in the dealing room and coming back during work hours having consumed an unreasonable amount of alcohol (which) seemed in violation of our code of conduct".
The scandal would also likely impact Elliott's annual pay package, the CEO said, noting the bank's board was due to begin deciding his bonuses next week.
"I get paid on those issues and get evaluated once a year," he said.
"As it happens, that process has just started. I imagine that there absolutely will be consequences."
($1 = 1.4702 Australian dollars)
Reporting by Byron Kaye in Sydney; Editing by Alasdair Pal, Christian Schmollinger and Jamie Freed
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
