XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

Amneal, US FTC win order removing Teva inhaler patents from FDA list



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Amneal, US FTC win order removing Teva inhaler patents from FDA list</title></head><body>

By Blake Brittain

June 10 (Reuters) -Drugmaker Amneal Pharmaceuticals AMRX.O with the backing of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission convinced a New Jersey federal court on Monday to remove five Teva Pharmaceutical TEVA.TA patents from a U.S. Food and Drug Administration list of patents covering Teva's breathing drug ProAir HFA.

U.S. District Judge Stanley Chesler agreed with Amneal and the FTC that Teva's patents only covered inhaler device technology, ordering it to remove the listings from the FDA's Orange Book and clearing an obstacle for Amneal's proposed generic.

The decision follows the FTC's warnings to drugmakers including Teva over the misuse of Orange Book patent listings to wrongly extend patent monopolies on brand-name drugs. Chesler on Monday also rejected Teva's bid to dismiss Amneal's allegations that Teva violated state and federal antitrust law.

Spokespeople for Teva, Amneal and the FTC did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the decision.

Teva sued Amneal for patent infringement last year based on its proposed generic version of ProAir HFA, which treats bronchial spasms caused by diseases like asthma. Teva stopped making ProAir HFA in 2022.

Amneal counterclaimed that Teva had improperly submitted the patents to the Orange Book, which lists patents that cover drugs that the FDA has deemed safe and effective.

The FTC last year sent notices to Teva and other drugmakersdisputing 110 of their Orange Book patents, and said the companies may have improperly submitted them to the FDA to delay generic competition. The commission filed a brief supporting Amneal in the New Jersey case.

Chesler agreed with Amneal and the FTC that Teva's patents only cover parts of a "metered inhaler device" and "do not claim or even mention" ProAir HFA.

The case is Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D Inc v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York LLC, U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 2:23-cv-20964.

For Teva: Daryl Wiesen and Natasha Daughtrey of Goodwin Procter

For Amneal: Rebekah Conroy of Stone Conroy; Steven Maddox and Jeremy Edwards of Procopio


Read more:

US FTC warns drugmakers over patent listings

US FTC disputes over 100 medical patents listed with FDA including asthma inhalers


</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.