Airlines’ margins head to lower cruising altitude
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Oliver Taslic
LONDON, Aug 2 (Reuters Breakingviews) -In one sense, airlines are flying high. Lobby group IATA recorded a 9% year-on-year jump in global passenger demand in June, and Europe’s big six listed carriers – Ryanair RYA.I, easyJet EZJ.L, Wizz Air WIZZ.L, IAG ICAG.L, Lufthansa LHAG.DE and Air France-KLM AIRF.PA – all reported annual traffic growth in the most recent quarter. Yet they have a cost problem – and it could get worse.
Healthy revenues and weak profits have been a recurrent theme among European airlines. UK-based easyJet was one exception, though Ryanair boss Michael O’Leary told Reuters he thought this was helped by easier prior year comparisons. At Air France-KLM, revenue rose 4.3% year-on-year in the second quarter, but its operating margin fell 3.1 percentage points as costs crept up. Ryanair, announcing last week a 46% year-on-year fall in net profit, also sounded the alarm on ticket prices: it had to cut fares some 15% to fill aircraft, while Lufthansa and Wizz Air also said they foresaw pressure on “yields” – revenue generated per passenger per mile flown.
So far, so predictable. Amid soaring travel demand, an excess of pilots and cabin crew during the pandemic has turned to a shortage, meaning they can extract hefty wage increases. Meanwhile, delays from both Airbus AIR.PA and Boeing BA.N in delivering new planes to airlines have proven a double whammy: carriers spent time and money hiring and training staff for aircraft that didn’t arrive, while the slack had to be picked up by older jets that are less efficient and require more maintenance.
Unfortunately, the green transition could hike costs further. Offsetting carbon emissions, acquiring more efficient aircraft and making aviation fuel cleaner all costs money. Take sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). Using fuels made from sustainable feedstocks such as food waste rather than hydrocarbons is by far the most plausible way of decarbonising air travel. That’s why the UK and EU have introduced mandates that, from next year, say that 2% of supplied jet fuel must be SAF. By 2030 those figures will rise to 10% and 6% respectively. The problem is that SAF can cost three times as much as traditional jet fuel. Air New Zealand AIR.NZ, for its part, on Tuesday abandoned a 2030 emissions reduction target, citing delays in the delivery of new, more efficient aircraft and steep SAF costs.
Airlines could try hiking prices, as carriers from Lufthansa to Norwegian Air NAS.OL have proposed. But that could hit demand. Alternatively, despite IAG shelving on Thursday a plan to acquire the rest of Spain’s Air Europa, airlines could cut costs through consolidation. Yet absent concerted efforts from governments to incentivise more production of green fuels, the most likely endgame is that airlines just make less money. Steadily declining earnings multiples over the last year suggest investors are already strapping themselves in.
Follow @Breakingviews on X
CONTEXT NEWS
British Airways owner IAG reported second-quarter results on Aug. 1. Revenue came in at 8.3 billion euros, up 7.8% year-on-year. Operating profit was 1.2 billion euros, down 0.8% but ahead of analysts’ consensus forecast. Passenger numbers came in at almost 32 million, up 6.1% versus the previous year.
For the full year, the group said it expected strong demand for travel, and maintained its guidance of raising capacity 7%. It said non-fuel unit costs were expected to increase slightly overall in 2024, and also announced a return to paying a dividend.
IAG also scrapped its attempt to buy the 80% of Spain’s Air Europa it didn’t own, citing concerns about the regulatory environment.
IAG shares were up 5% at 168 pence at 0730 GMT on Aug. 2.
European airline forward P/E ratios have been descending https://reut.rs/3Sy5X8l
Editing by George Hay and Streisand Neto
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
